Mathis v. Hegwood

1 Citing case

  1. Baker v. Schrimsher

    731 S.E.2d 646 (Ga. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    See Brown v. Parks, 190 Ga. 540(2), 9 S.E.2d 897 (1940).” Mathis v. Hegwood, 212 Ga.App. 335, 441 S.E.2d 766 (1994). The dormancy statute does not apply to a judgment that requires the performance of an act or duty. Collier v. Bank of Tupelo, 190 Ga. 598 (Hn.2), 10 S.E.2d 62 (1940).