Opinion
November, 1928.
Present — Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
MATHEY v. LA ROW
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Summaries of
MATHEY v. LA ROW
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for
MATHEY v. LA ROW
Case Details
Full title:N.W. MATHEY, Respondent, v. WALKER LA ROW and Another, Appellants
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1928
Citations
225 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Citing Cases
Smyth v. Thomas
n text-writers agree that a remainder of the character devised in items VIII, IX and X are contingent (Kales…
Hitchcock v. Skelly Oil Co.(pp. 319, 320.) For other cases of like import where devises employing similar language were held to create…