Opinion
November 18, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.
Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The motion, denominated by defendant Prescotech A Company of Tennetics, Inc. and Supreme Court as one to "reargue and/or renew", was in fact a motion to reargue. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Matter of Hurley v Avon Cent. School Dist., 187 A.D.2d 982 [decided herewith]; Kirchoff v International Harvester Co., 138 A.D.2d 820, 821; Matter of Jones v Marcy, 135 A.D.2d 887, 888).