From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathews v. Mattina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jul 24, 2013
No.: 3:11-cv-544 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:11-cv-544

07-24-2013

JAMES E. MATHEWS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH P. MATTINA, Defendant.


Judge Phillips


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is a pro se prisoner's civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On motion of the plaintiff, default was entered against the defendant. The defendant, by and through counsel, has now filed a motion to set aside the entry of default. The record reflects that on August 3, 2012, the court allowed plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs and ordered plaintiff to compete the service packet, which he did. The U.S. Marshals Service then issued process by certified mail addressed to the defendant at 800 Howard Baker Avenue, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37915, which is the address for the Knoxville Police Department. On August 30, 2012, Adam Minner accepted the certified mail as agent for the defendant.

In support of his motion, defendant has submitted his affidavit and states that he was not served with the summons and complaint. [Doc. 38, Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, Exhibit A, Affidavit of Joseph P. Mattina, p. 1]. He further states that Adam Minner, who is employed in the personnel department of the City of Knoxville Police Department, does not possess authority to receive process on his behalf. [Id.]. Under the circumstances, the motion to set aside entry of default [Doc. 38] is GRANTED. The Clerk is ORDERED to SET ASIDE the entry of default previously entered in this cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c).

Counsel for defendant is ORDERED to inform the court, within fifteen (15) days of the entry of this Memorandum and Order, whether counsel will accept service of process on behalf of the defendant or, if not, the address at which defendant may best be served with process.

ENTER:

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mathews v. Mattina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jul 24, 2013
No.: 3:11-cv-544 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Mathews v. Mattina

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. MATHEWS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH P. MATTINA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Jul 24, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:11-cv-544 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2013)