From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matheson v. Mente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

May, 1914.


Inasmuch as George F. Stainton, the younger, was not a party to this action, the judgment as entered at Special Term would be no legal bar against him or those claiming under him, and plaintiff would not be protected thereby by acquiescence in the same. The judgment should be modified by providing for a foreclosure and sale for the full amount due thereon, with interest and costs, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Matheson v. Mente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Matheson v. Mente

Case Details

Full title:Malcolm Ross Matheson, as Substituted Trustee, etc., of Richard J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1914

Citations

163 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)