Opinion
No. 120292.
October 30, 2002.
COA: 213957, Ingham CC: 96-083519-NZ
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the August 7, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to whether that Court erred by holding that other employees were not comparable to plaintiff because they were hired by different plants or by a different supervisor at the Lansing plant. In addition, the parties are directed to brief the question whether Michigan should adopt the test of comparability as enunciated in Mitchell v Toledo Hosp, 964 F.2d 577, 583 (CA 6, 1992).
Kelly, J., would deny leave to appeal.