From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matheney v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 28, 2011
Case No. C11-5239 JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C11-5239 JRC.

March 28, 2011


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate parties. It is the responsibility of plaintiff and plaintiff's attorney to properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Matheney v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 28, 2011
Case No. C11-5239 JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Matheney v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KAYLA R MATHENEY Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. C11-5239 JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 28, 2011)