Opinion
May 8, 1942.
Appeal from Supreme Court, New York county.
Present — Martin, P.J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
We interpret the interlocutory judgment to mean that on the accounting plaintiff is entitled to one-third of the assets of the partnership after crediting each partner with the amount of such partner's capital contributions. As so interpreted, we think the judgment is correct.
The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.