From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mateos v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 14, 2011
373 P.3d 940 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57341.

07-14-2011

Mario MATEOS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Edward T. Reed Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Mario Mateos, Jr.


Edward T. Reed

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Mario Mateos, Jr.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of sexual assault. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Patrick Flanagan, Judge. Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal voluntarily. Counsel indicates that appellant understands the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal and that he has been “unequivocal in his desire to dismiss the appeal.” Cause appearing, the motion is granted and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Mateos v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 14, 2011
373 P.3d 940 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Mateos v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mario MATEOS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 14, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 940 (Nev. 2011)