From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mateos v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 3, 2013
110 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-3

In the Matter of Edward MATEOS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Edward Mateos, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Edward Mateos, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After petitioner's urine twice tested positive for opiates, he was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance. Petitioner was found guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing, although the penalty imposed was modified upon administrative review. The present CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The hearing testimony, misbehavior report and positive drug test results provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Johnson v. Fischer, 104 A.D.3d 1007, 1007, 960 N.Y.S.2d 560 [2013];Matter of Smith v. Dubray, 58 A.D.3d 968, 968–969, 871 N.Y.S.2d 758 [2009] ). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the hearing testimony demonstrated that proper testing procedures were followed and that the correction officer who conducted the tests was certified to do so ( see Matter of Bornstorff v. Bezio, 73 A.D.3d 1397, 1397–1398, 903 N.Y.S.2d 168 [2010] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent they are properly presented for our review, have been considered and found to lack merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ROSE, J.P., McCARTHY, SPAIN and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mateos v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 3, 2013
110 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Mateos v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Edward MATEOS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 3, 2013

Citations

110 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6416
971 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

Creamer v. Venettozzi

The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting the commencement of this CPLR…

Bussey v. Comm'r of Corr. & Cmty. Supervisio

We confirm. The hearing testimony, misbehavior report and positive drug test results provide substantial…