From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mateo v. Gundrum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 9:10-cv-1103 (GLS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 9:10-cv-1103 (GLS/TWD)

05-23-2012

CESAR MATEO Plaintiff, v. M. GUNDRUM, MARTIN, DANIEL MARTUSCELLO Defendants.

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: CESAR MATEO Plaintiff, pro se Sing Sing Correctional Facility OF COUNSEL: FOR THE DEFENDANTS: HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York The Capitol JAMES SEAMAN, ESQ.


APPEARANCES:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

CESAR MATEO

Plaintiff, pro se

Sing Sing Correctional Facility

OF COUNSEL:

FOR THE DEFENDANTS:

HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN

Attorney General for the

State of New York

The Capitol

JAMES SEAMAN, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE

ORDER

The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, duly filed April 30, 2012. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks filed April 30, 2012 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein, and it is further

ORDERED that the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 39) is accepted for filing as the operative pleading in this action; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Martuscello from this action without leave to amend; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants Gundrum and Martin be directed to answer Plaintiff's retaliation claims within two weeks of this Order adopting the Report-Recommendation; and it is further

ORDERED that the Court dismisses the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Gundrum and Martin, the conspiracy claims, and the due process claims without leave to amend; and it is further

ORDERED that upon receipt from Plaintiff of the documents required for service, the Clerk shall issue summonses and forward them, along with copies of the second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 39), to the United States Marshal for service upon Defendant Mohammed Khair; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is to serve a copy of this order upon the parties in accordance with the court's local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: May 23, 2012

Albany, New York

___________

GARY L. SHARPE,

CHIEF JUDGE

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Mateo v. Gundrum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 9:10-cv-1103 (GLS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Mateo v. Gundrum

Case Details

Full title:CESAR MATEO Plaintiff, v. M. GUNDRUM, MARTIN, DANIEL MARTUSCELLO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 9:10-cv-1103 (GLS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2012)