From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matelic v. Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 12, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-13523 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 12, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-13523

03-12-2018

JOHN MATELIC, Plaintiff, v. BENITO MENDOZA, Defendant.


DISTRICT JUDGE AVERN COHN

ORDER

On December 12, 2016, Plaintiff John Matelic filed an amended complaint adding David Taft as a Defendant. To date, Taft has not been served.

Having been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff is entitled to service by the United States Marshal. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). However, it is Plaintiff's responsibility to provide an address at which a defendant may be served. See Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993); Herbert v. Roark, 2006 WL 1284695 (E.D. Mich. 2006).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that within 14 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, will provide to the United States Marshal an address at which Defendant Taft can be served. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in a recommendation that Defendant Taft be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon timely receipt of Taft's address, the U.S. Marshal will serve Defendant Taft at that address by certified mail, return receipt requested, as authorized by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(e) and M.C.R. § 2.105(A)(2). The U.S. Marshal may collect the usual and customary costs from Plaintiff after effectuating service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), that the time for service of the summons and complaint is extended to April 26, 2018.

s/ R. Steven Whalen

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: March 12, 2018

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on March 12, 2018, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla

Case Manager to the

Honorable R. Steven Whalen


Summaries of

Matelic v. Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 12, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-13523 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Matelic v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MATELIC, Plaintiff, v. BENITO MENDOZA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-13523 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 12, 2018)