From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matejka v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Jul 8, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1933 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 8, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1933

07-08-2014

KRISTEN A. MATEJKA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER

[Resolving Doc. No. 1]

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On September 4, 2013, Plaintiff Kristen Matejka filed a complaint seeking judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny her Social Security Disability benefits for lack of disability. Under Local Rule 72.2, the Court referred the petition to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke for a Report and Recommendation. On June 10, 2014, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a report recommending this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and REVERSES AND REMANDS the Commissioner's decision for further proceedings.

Doc. 1.

Doc. 20.

The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection. Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service. Failure to object within that time waives a party's right to appeal the magistrate judge's recommendation. Absent objection, a district court may adopt the magistrate judge's report without review.

Id.; see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149.

In this case, neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS in whole Magistrate Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it fully herein by reference. The Court REVERSES AND REMANDS the Commissioner's decision for further proceedings.

Defendant has filed a response indicating it will not object. Doc. 21.
--------

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Matejka v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Jul 8, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1933 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Matejka v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:KRISTEN A. MATEJKA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Jul 8, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1933 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Hall v. Saul

The Sixth Circuit makes clear that "[e]ven where an ALJ provides 'great weight' to an opinion, there is no…

Dickinson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

First, the ALJ is not required to adopt all of the limitations recommended by a source simply because that…