From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mateicka v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
May 4, 2012
NO. CV-10-3088-JPH (E.D. Wash. May. 4, 2012)

Opinion

NO. CV-10-3088-JPH

05-04-2012

ANDREW MATEICKA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BEFORE THE COURT is the Magistrate Judge's report, ECF No. 31, recommending the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for EAJA fees, ECF No. 26.

No objections have been filed. In the Defendant's response to the motion, he agreed the amount requested is reasonable but asked that the award be payable to Plaintiff subject to offset, ECF No. 30. The magistrate judge agreed with the Defendant, ECF No. 31.

Having reviewed the report and the files and records herein, the Court adopts the magistrate judge's report in its entirety.

IT IS ORDERED:

The recommendation, ECF No. 31, to grant Plaintiff's motion for EAJA fees is ADOPTED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment for Plaintiff, forward copies to the parties and Magistrate Judge Hutton, and close the file.

____________

ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mateicka v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
May 4, 2012
NO. CV-10-3088-JPH (E.D. Wash. May. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Mateicka v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW MATEICKA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: May 4, 2012

Citations

NO. CV-10-3088-JPH (E.D. Wash. May. 4, 2012)