Opinion
Case Number 18-12102
08-29-2019
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER, AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT
Presently before the Court is the report issued on August 14, 2019 by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and affirm the decision of the Commissioner. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 19) is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 15) is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
It is further ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge Date: August 29, 2019
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 29, 2019.
s/Susan K. Pinkowski
SUSAN K. PINKOWSKI