From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mastro v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
May 6, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-134-CL (D. Or. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-134-CL

05-06-2013

PAULA L. MASTRO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Here, plaintiff objects to the Findings and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the ALJ's findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation (#21) is adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mastro v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
May 6, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-134-CL (D. Or. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Mastro v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:PAULA L. MASTRO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-134-CL (D. Or. May. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Colvin

an unreported decision, however, the Ninth Circuit found no error in an ALJ's failure to expressly state his…