Opinion
Case No. SC04-1181.
February 11, 2005.
Lower Tribunal No. 3D03-2594.
The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied on the merits. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and BELL, JJ., concur.