From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Masterson v. New York Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1992
181 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert S. Rose, J.).


The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff leave to amend her bill of particulars to include new injuries and a new theory of recovery eight years after the lawsuit was commenced, over a year after the matter was placed on the trial calendar, and after the jury had been selected (Simpson v Browning-Ferris Indus. Chem. Servs., 146 A.D.2d 769). Plaintiff failed to satisfactorily explain this long delay in seeking the amendment (see, Pearce v Booth Mem. Hosp., 152 A.D.2d 553), and defendant would be substantially prejudiced were the amendment permitted (Eggeling v County of Nassau, 97 A.D.2d 395).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Masterson v. New York Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1992
181 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Masterson v. New York Hospital

Case Details

Full title:LYNNE MASTERSON, Appellant, v. NEW YORK HOSPITAL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 352

Citing Cases

Spielberger v. Giambalvo

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Given the age of the case, the…

Jefferson v. Long Island College Hospital

Further, the plaintiffs submissions failed to create triable issues of fact with respect to (1) the claim…