From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MasterObjects, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
Case No. CV 11-1054 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-1054 PJH

11-29-2011

MASTEROBJECTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

HOSIE RICE LLP William P. Nelson Attorneys for Plaintiff MasterObjects, Inc. McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Vera M. Elson Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.


SPENCER HOSIE (SBN 101777)

GEORGE F. BISHOP (SBN 89205)

DIANE S. RICE (SBN 118303)

WILLIAM P. NELSON (SBN 196091)

HOSIE RICE LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MASTEROBJECTS, INC.

TERRENCE P. McMAHON (SBN 71910)

VERA M. ELSON (SBN 156327)

VANESSA LEFORT (SBN 260687)

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

GOOGLE INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff MasterObjects, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and defendant Google Inc. ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, on or about March 7, 2011, Plaintiff served its Original Complaint upon Defendant; Plaintiff's Original Complaint alleges counts for patent infringement, including direct infringement, induced infringement, and contributory infringement;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint on June 10, 2011;

WHEREAS, at the September 22, 2011 Status Conference, the parties discussed the circumstances under which MasterObject's newly allowed patent application would be asserted in this action;

WHEREAS, U.S. Patent No. 8,060,639 issued to MasterObjects on November 15, 2011;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to seek leave to file its Second Amended Complaint, whereby Plaintiff no longer alleges (and hereby withdraws its earlier allegations) that Defendant infringes under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 (b) or (c).

WHEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES HERETO that Plaintiff may seek leave from the Court to file its Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, and Defendant will not oppose. Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective counsel of record, have agreed to this filing.

HOSIE RICE LLP

William P. Nelson

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MasterObjects, Inc.

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Vera M. Elson

Attorneys for Defendant

Google Inc.

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

William P. Nelson

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT

Leave to file Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED.

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

MasterObjects, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
Case No. CV 11-1054 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

MasterObjects, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MASTEROBJECTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. AND RELATED…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-1054 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)