Master Mechanical v. Shoal Const.

7 Citing cases

  1. Black v. Reybold Venture Grp. VII, LLC

    C.A. No. N18C-02-177 WCC (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 6, 2018)   Cited 1 times
    Finding the notice provision of Section 3914 does not apply to a tortfeasor, while fashioning a remedy consistent with the policy of the statute

    Id. Master Mechanical Inc. v. Shoal Construction, Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. May 29, 2009). See Spence v. Funk, 396 A.2d 967, 968 (Del. 1978).

  2. Garvin v. City of Wilmington

    C.A. No.: N17C-07-104 WCC (Del. Super. Ct. May. 8, 2018)

    Id. Master Mechanical Inc. v. Shoal Construction, Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. May 29, 2009). 10 Del. C. § 4011.

  3. Shiyanbola v. Amazon, LLC

    C.A. No. N17C-08-302 CEB (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 8, 2018)   Cited 2 times
    Granting a motion to dismiss a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress where the factual allegations in the complaint, which detailed how an employee was terminated after being forced to take a drug test, "simply do not come close to rising to the level of 'extreme and outrageous conduct'"

    Id. (citing American Ins. Co. v. Material Transit, Inc., 446 A.2d 1101, 1102 (Del. Super. 1982)). Master Mech. Inc. v. Shoal Constr., Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. May 29, 2009). Hedenberg v. Raber, 2004 WL 2191164, at *1 (Del. Super. Aug. 20, 2004).

  4. Speedway LLC v. State Dep't of Transp.

    C.A. No. N16C-01-189 CEB (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 31, 2016)

    Id. (citing American Ins. Co. v. Material Transit, Inc., 446 A.2d 1101, 1102 (Del. Super. Ct. March 31, 1982)). Master Mech. Inc. v. Shoal Constr., Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. May 29, 2009). Hedenberg v. Raber, 2004 WL 2191164, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 20, 2004).

  5. Christiansen v. Robbins Hose Co.

    C.A. No. N15C-12-109 CEB (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 23, 2016)

    Super. 1982)). Master Mech. Inc. v. Shoal Constr., Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. May 29, 2009). The Court may raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte.

  6. Wilmer v. Ocwen Fin. Corp.

    C.A. No. N15C-08-082 CEB (Del. Super. Ct. May. 31, 2016)   Cited 3 times
    Concluding that a mortgage that allegedly went into default in 2011 was still enforceable because the word "seal" was clearly visible next to the individual mortgagor's signature

    Id. (citing American Ins. Co. v. Material Transit, Inc., 446 A.2d 1101, 1102 (Del. Super. 1982)). Master Mech. Inc. v. Shoal Constr., Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. May 29, 2009). Hedenberg v. Raber, 2004 WL 2191164, at *1 (Del. Super. Aug. 20, 2004).

  7. GFP Firedancer LLC v. E. Coast Cycles, Inc.

    C.A. No. N15C-11-114 CEB (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 29, 2016)

    Id. (citing American Ins. Co. v. Material Transit, Inc., 446 A.2d 1101, 1102 (Del. Super. 1982)). Master Mechanical Inc. v. Shoal Construction, Inc., 2009 WL 1515591, at *1 (Del. Super. May 29, 2009). 5. As a general rule, when "matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the Court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56.