From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 4, 2022
No. 09-21-00240-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 4, 2022)

Opinion

09-21-00240-CV

08-04-2022

PATRICIA MASSEY, Appellant v. OLIVER WILLIAMS, Appellee


Submitted on July 26, 2022.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21-32164.

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

W. SCOTT GOLEMON, Chief Justice.

This forcible detainer case began in the justice court. Oliver Williams obtained a default judgment for possession and back rent, and Patricia Massey appealed to the county court at law. The trial court signed a docket control order that set the case for a bench trial on July 26, 2021, scheduled an announcement docket for the Tuesday prior to trial, and set a pre-trial conference for the Friday prior to trial. Williams filed a motion for default judgment after Massey failed to file a written answer. After a hearing in which Williams offered no evidence, on July 16, 2021, the trial court signed an order granting the motion and ordering that a writ of possession issue. The order did not render judgment on the claims for rent and attorney's fees pleaded in Williams's amended original petition. On July 20, 2021, the trial court signed an order of dismissal for want of prosecution that struck Williams's pleadings and dismissed the case due to Williams's failure to appear for the call of the announcement docket. A writ of possession issued on July 23, 2021, but the officer's return is blank. Massey filed a notice of appeal on August 12, 2021. Williams did not file a notice of appeal.

We "may not grant a party who does not file a notice of appeal more favorable relief than did the trial court except for just cause. "Tex. R. App.P. 25.1(c).

On May 9, 2022, Massey filed her Appellant's Brief pro se. As relief she asks the Court to grant her the right to buy or lease the property. According to Massey, in July 2021, Williams made a verbal agreement to allow her to stay and on August 3, 2021, Williams's son told her he would be responsible for letting her know what to do. She cites no authority to support her argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 38. l(i). No brief has been filed on behalf of the Appellee.

In a letter, an attorney retained by Bridget Williams and Renee Rylander informed this Court that he had not been retained for the appeal but he advised that Oliver Williams died intestate on August 3,2021. The appeal continues as if all the parties were alive. See id. 7.1(a). Our correspondence has been sent to counsel of record for the appellee. See id. 6.1(b), 6.3(b). Trial counsel did not file a non representation notice. See id. 6.4.

Massey's argument relies entirely upon facts not shown in the record. We must limit our review of the trial court's judgment to matters shown in the trial court's record. Sabine Offshore Serv., Inc. v. City of Port Arthur, 595 S.W.2d 840, 841 (Tex. 1979). We cannot reverse a trial court's judgment absent properly assigned error. Pat Baker Co. v. Wilson, 971 S.W.2d 447, 450 (Tex. 1998).

This appeal presents no reversible error. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.1(a) ("No judgment may be reversed on appeal on the ground that the trial court made an error of law unless the court of appeals concludes that the error complained of: (1) probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment; or (2) probably prevented the appellant from properly presenting the case to the court of appeals."). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's July 20,2021 Order of Dismissal.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Massey v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 4, 2022
No. 09-21-00240-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Massey v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MASSEY, Appellant v. OLIVER WILLIAMS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 4, 2022

Citations

No. 09-21-00240-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 4, 2022)