Opinion
3:11-cv-01294-TC
04-23-2012
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on March 16, 2012, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Petitioner has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given pig novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.
I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recominendation filed March 16, 2012, in its entirety. Petitioner's petition (#2) is denied. This proceeding is dismissed. The clerk of court will enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE