From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Shpits

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2021
20-cv-8828 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-8828 (ALC)

12-20-2021

TYRONE H. MASSEY, Plaintiff, v. IOSIF SHPITS, M.D., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:

On September 20, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' letter requesting a pre-motion conference in connection with their anticipated motion to dismiss the Complaint. ECF No. 49. On December 5, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by November 30, 2021 as to why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 52. Such showing was not made.

Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (“[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute ....”).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve Plaintiff with a copy of the instant order and terminate ECF No. 54.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Massey v. Shpits

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2021
20-cv-8828 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Massey v. Shpits

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE H. MASSEY, Plaintiff, v. IOSIF SHPITS, M.D., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

20-cv-8828 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021)