From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1915
84 S.E. 1047 (N.C. 1915)

Opinion

(Filed 22 April, 1915.)

1. Courts — Continuance of Case — Discretionary Powers — Appeal and Error.

The continuance of a case is within the discretion of the trial judge, and will not be reviewed on appeal when no abuse thereof is made to appear.

2. Instructions — Trials — Negligence — Wrongful Death — Measure of Damages.

The instruction of the court to the jury upon the measure of damages recoverable for the wrongful death of the plaintiff's intestate is approved under Ward v. R. R., 161 N.C. 186, and that line of cases.

APPEAL by defendant from Rountree, J., at September Term, 1914, of DURHAM.

Civil action, tried upon these issues:

1. Is the plaintiff the duly qualified administratrix of Patrick H. Massey? Answer: "Yes."

2. Was the plaintiff's intestate killed by the negligence of defendant's lessee, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes."

3. If so, did plaintiff's intestate by negligence on his part (246) contribute to his death? Answer: "No."

4. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recovery? Answer: "$9,750."

From the judgment rendered defendant appealed.

Bryant Brogden for plaintiff.

Guthrie Guthrie, J. L. Morehead, W. G. Bramham for defendant.


The negligence of the defendant and its liability for damages is admitted. The only assignments of error relate to the refusal of his Honor to continue the case at the instance of the defendant, and to his Honor's charge upon the question of damages. It is well settled that the continuance of the cause is within the sound discretion of the judge. We find nothing in this record denoting any abuse of such discretion. We have examined the charge of the court on the question of damages, and find it to be a correct expression of the law, as laid down by this Court in a number of cases. Burton v. R. R., 82 N.C. 507; Benson v. R. R., 122 N.C. 1009; Mendenhall v. R. R., 123 N.C. 278; Watson v. R. R., 133 N.C. 190; Ward v. R. R., 161 N.C. 186.

No error.

Cited: Gurley v. Power Co., 172 N.C. 695; Hanes v. Utilities Co., 191 N.C. 20; Davis v. Ins. Co., 197 N.C. 621.


Summaries of

Massey v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1915
84 S.E. 1047 (N.C. 1915)
Case details for

Massey v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA MASSEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF P. H. MASSEY, DECEASED, v. NORTH…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1915

Citations

84 S.E. 1047 (N.C. 1915)
169 N.C. 245

Citing Cases

Gurley v. Power Co.

The defendant power company excepts to the following charge on the last issue as to damages: "The measure of…

Davis v. Insurance Company

Ordinarily, a continuance rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. Massey v. R. R., 169 N.C. 245, 84…