From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Curiel

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 20, 2022
2:22-cv-01902-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01902-CDS-DJA

12-20-2022

DAVID MASSEY, an individual, Plaintiff v. PABLO DIAZ CURIEL aka PABLO DIAZ, an individual, and DOES 1 through X, inclusive, Defendants

PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP, Jeffery A. Garofalo, Zagros S. Bassirian (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff David Massey. FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. John D. Tennert III Wade Beavers Louis D. Lopez (Pro Hac Vice) Charles E. Markle (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant Pablo Diaz Curiel aka Pablo Diaz


Removed from Eight Judicial District Court, Clark County Case No. A-22-860754-B

PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP, Jeffery A. Garofalo, Zagros S. Bassirian (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff David Massey.

FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. John D. Tennert III Wade Beavers Louis D. Lopez (Pro Hac Vice) Charles E. Markle (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant Pablo Diaz Curiel aka Pablo Diaz

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STIPULATION

[ECF NO. 28]

Cristina D. Silva, United States District Judge

Plaintiff David Massey (“Massey”) and Defendant Pablo Diaz Curiel aka Pablo Diaz (“Diaz”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly submit this Notice of Settlement and Stipulation:

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Massey and Diaz have reached a settlement in the above-captioned matter, and the parties are in the process of finalizing a written settlement agreement. After a fully executed copy of the settlement agreement is circulated Massey intends to dismiss this action, r with prejudice. In connection with that settlement, the parties wish to vacate all currently pending hearings without prejudice and stay these proceedings so that the parties may finalize their agreement and resolve all claims in this action, while preserving party and judicial resources. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that:

1. Any and all pending motions and hearings in this action shall be vacated, without prejudice.

2. This action shall be stayed in its entirety until either: (a) Massey dismisses this action with prejudice; or (b) the parties advise the Court through a joint stipulation that the stay should be lifted.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties set forth above, it is hereby ordered that:

1. Any and all pending motions in this action shall be vacated, without prejudice.

2. This action shall be stayed in its entirety until either: (a) Massey dismisses this action with prejudice; or (b) the parties advise the Court through a joint stipulation that the stay should be lifted.

3. The parties must appear for a status hearing re: settlement documents on February 23, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. in LV courtroom 6B. The hearing will be vacated upon the filing of settlement documents before that date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Massey v. Curiel

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 20, 2022
2:22-cv-01902-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Massey v. Curiel

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MASSEY, an individual, Plaintiff v. PABLO DIAZ CURIEL aka PABLO…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01902-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)