From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-121-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-121-JJB-SCR

04-09-2014

PAUL MASSEY (#521030) v. BURL CAIN, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated March 20, 2014 (doc. no. 3). The plaintiff filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly considered.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the petitioner (sic) Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by Paul Massey is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state remedies.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 9th day of April, 2013.

___________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Massey v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-121-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Massey v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:PAUL MASSEY (#521030) v. BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-121-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 9, 2014)