From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Ballard

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Sep 8, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00936 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 8, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00936.

September 8, 2009


ORDER


Pending before the court is the respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket 13]. This action was referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition ("PF R"), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the court grant the respondent's motion for summary judgment and deny the petitioner's § 2554 petition.

The petitioner timely filed written objections to the Magistrate Judge's PF R. The court has performed a de novo review of those portions of the findings and recommendations that the petitioner objected. The court FINDS that the objections are without merit. The court agrees with the thorough analysis of the Magistrate Judge. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

Massey v. Ballard

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Sep 8, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00936 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Massey v. Ballard

Case Details

Full title:ORVILLE C. MASSEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. DAVID BALLARD Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00936 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Massey v. Wriston

Rather, as alleged in the Complaint, they monitored and recorded one of Plaintiff's telephone conversations…

Williams v. Wells

Generally, a prisoner may not collaterally attack a state conviction on the grounds that illegal evidence was…