From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Masser et al. v. the London Operating Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Jan 6, 1932
139 So. 154 (Fla. 1932)

Summary

In Equipment Finance Corp. v. Atkins, 19 La. App. 834, 139 So. 154, the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit held that an exception directed against the corporate capacity of a plaintiff corporation is dilatory and must be pleaded in limine and that the right to make such a plea is lost by a confirmation of default.

Summary of this case from Post Office Employees Credit Union v. Frosina

Opinion

Decision filed January 6, 1932.

An appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County; Worth W. Trammell, Judge.

Vincent C. Giblin and Aronovitz Goldstein, all of Miami, for Appellants;

John C. Sullivan and Carl T. Hoffman, both of Miami, for Appellee.


This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of counsel for Appellee to vacate the order of supersedeas entered herein by a Justice of this Court on December 23, 1931, and to quash the constitutional writ issued in this cause by the Supreme Court on December 23, 1931, and the Court having considered said motion and heard the arguments of counsel for the respective parties, it is now considered and ordered by the Court that if within ten days from this date the appellants herein shall file in the Circuit Court for Dade County a good and sufficient bond in the sum of $15,000.00 conditioned to pay whatever judgment for rents of the property involved in this litigation is obtained against them in a Court of competent jurisdiction, then the aforesaid order of supersedeas and the aforesaid constitutional writ issued by this Court shall remain in full force and effect; otherwise the said order of supersedeas will stand vacated and the said constitutional writ will stand as quashed.

It is further ordered by the Court that the bond herein above mentioned shall be approved by one of the Judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida.


Summaries of

Masser et al. v. the London Operating Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Jan 6, 1932
139 So. 154 (Fla. 1932)

In Equipment Finance Corp. v. Atkins, 19 La. App. 834, 139 So. 154, the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit held that an exception directed against the corporate capacity of a plaintiff corporation is dilatory and must be pleaded in limine and that the right to make such a plea is lost by a confirmation of default.

Summary of this case from Post Office Employees Credit Union v. Frosina
Case details for

Masser et al. v. the London Operating Co.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY MASSER and MORRIS BARON, Appellants, vs. THE LONDON OPERATING…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Jan 6, 1932

Citations

139 So. 154 (Fla. 1932)
139 So. 154

Citing Cases

White v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury

The allegations of the petition, supported by its proper verification, established proof the action was…

Van Horn v. Vining

" See, also: Quick v. Littlejohn, 156 La. 369, 100 So. 531; Case v. Watson, 21 La. Ann. 731; Abel v. Roach,…