From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Masse v. Clark

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 10, 2007
Case No. C06-5375RBL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 10, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C06-5375RBL.

April 10, 2007


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Court's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #30].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

On April 6, 2007, plaintiff filed his motion for an extension of time to respond to the Report and Recommendation. On April 9, 2007, defendants filed their response indicating that they did not oppose the plaintiff's request. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Court's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #30] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until May 10, 2007 to object to the Report and Recommendation and Defendants' reply, if any, to the objection shall be due by May 17, 2007. This matter will be reset on the calendar for May 18, 2007.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.


Summaries of

Masse v. Clark

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 10, 2007
Case No. C06-5375RBL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Masse v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:TOBY MASSE, Plaintiff, v. SIDNEY CLARK, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Apr 10, 2007

Citations

Case No. C06-5375RBL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 10, 2007)