From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co. v. Cisneros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 21, 1991
171 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 21, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.).


On December 3, 1985, a fire broke out in Apartment 14A of a building located at 435 East 52nd Street in New York City while renovations were being performed in the apartment by contractors. The fire caused substantial damage, spreading to the apartment located directly below, Apartment 13A, where Advertising to Women, Inc. (herein referred to as "ATW") resided.

The plaintiff-respondent Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company, as subrogee of "ATW", commenced this action against defendant DEGI, the former managing agent of the building, contending that its actions had somehow caused or contributed to the fire. However, DEGI's term as managing agent ended on October 31, 1985, five weeks before the fire. Moreover, there was nothing in DEGI's management agreement which imposed any obligation upon it to supervise or control the contractors hired by individual tenants to perform work on their apartments.

Based on the termination date and documentary evidence of the management agreement, defendant DEGI's motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co. v. Cisneros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 21, 1991
171 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co. v. Cisneros

Case Details

Full title:MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of ADVERTISING TO WOMEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 260

Citing Cases

Baker v. 40 E. 80 Apartment Corp.

Penmark was properly found liable to 40 East on a contribution theory, because Penmark owed a contractual…

Baker v. 40 E. 80 Apartment Corp.

Penmark was properly found liable to 40 East on a contribution theory, because Penmark owed a contractual…