- Search with
- Parallel SearchEnter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
- or
- Keyword SearchEnter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
- ANDfraud AND damagesBoth terms in document
- ORcar OR automobileEither term in document
- NOTinfringement NOT patentTerm must not appear in document
- """due diligence"Exact match
- ()appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)Grouping terms
- *withdr*wSingle letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
- !infring!Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
- /ninvestor /5 diligenceTerms within n words of each other
- /sfees /s reasonableTerms within same sentence
- /padmissible /p warrantTerms within the same paragraph
Masood v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Or.
379 P.3d 515 (Or. 2016)2 Citing cases
Masood v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Or.
360 Or. 638 (Or. 2016) Cited 2 timesHolding that, where requirements of ORS 742.061 were met, insured was entitled to recover attorney fees incurred in enforcing an oral agreement between insured and insurer predicated on an underlying policy; stating that the "determinative question" under the statute was "the source of the insured's claim"
We ultimately denied defendant's petition. Masood v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Oregon , 359 Or. 525, 379 P.3d 515 (2016). Plaintiff now seeks an award of $30,771 in attorney fees incurred before this court, consisting of $24,501.50 for fees in responding to defendant's petition for review and $6,269.50 for fees in preparing the petition for attorney fees. He contends that, given the Court of Appeals' decision, he is the prevailing party on appeal and is entitled to fees under ORS 742.061. He asserts that he satisfied all the requirements for an award of fees under that statute.
Masood v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Or., an Or. Ins. Co.
393 P.3d 277 (Or. Ct. App. 2017) Cited 1 timesAddressing costs of daily trial transcripts under Oregon law on allowable costs
Defendant petitioned for review of our decision by the Supreme Court, which denied review. Masood v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Oregon , 359 Or. 525, 379 P.3d 515 (2016). Plaintiff thereafter petitioned the Supreme Court for an award of the attorney fees that he had incurred in responding to the petition for review, relying on ORS 742.061(1) as authority for the award.