From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Masonry Indus. Trust Admin., Inc. v. Petroske

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 29, 2012
Civ. No. 6:09-cv-1383-AA (D. Or. Nov. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 6:09-cv-1383-AA

11-29-2012

MASONRY INDUSTRY TRUST ADMINISTRATION, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. DAVID PETROSKE, doing business as D/J Caulkings and Coatings, Defendant.


ORDER

Aiken, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff filed suit to recover contributions owed by defendant David Petroske on behalf of various employees who performed work covered by the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). See 29 U.S.C. § 185(c); 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e). Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment against Petroske. The court provided the requisite Rule 56 notice and warnings to defendant, who has failed to respond or object to plaintiff's motion.

Upon review of the motion and supporting memorandum and declaration (docs. 96-98, 100), I find that no genuine dispute of material fact precludes summary judgment in plaintiffs favor. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Specifically, plaintiff submitted uncontroverted evidence that defendant failed to report certain hours of covered work performed by his employees and failed to pay all contributions required under the CBA and relevant agreements. Plaintiff thus establishes that it is entitled to recover the following amounts from defendant: 1) $25,635.28 in ERISA and Ancillary Contributions; 2) $11,816.42 in interest calculated through September 30, 2011, with interest continuing to accrue on the amount of the unpaid contributions at the rate of $11.86 per day from October 1, 2011, until paid; and 3) $2,429.88 in liquidated damages of the unpaid ERISA Contributions. See Am. Horn Decl. and attached Exhibits (doc. 100).

Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 96) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed Order of Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Ann Aiken

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Masonry Indus. Trust Admin., Inc. v. Petroske

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 29, 2012
Civ. No. 6:09-cv-1383-AA (D. Or. Nov. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Masonry Indus. Trust Admin., Inc. v. Petroske

Case Details

Full title:MASONRY INDUSTRY TRUST ADMINISTRATION, INC., an Oregon corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 6:09-cv-1383-AA (D. Or. Nov. 29, 2012)