From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 3, 2023
360 So. 3d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1D22-2569.

05-03-2023

James MASON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

James Mason, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


James Mason, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. Because the trial court has ruled on the petition underlying the request for hearing, Petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal. See City of Coral Gables v. State ex rel. Worley, 44 So.2d 298, 300 (Fla. 1950) ("The relator must establish a clear right to [] issuance [of the writ of mandamus] and further show that no other adequate remedy exists."); Saba v. Bush, 883 So.2d 858, 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (denying petition where Petitioner had adequate remedy by appeal).

Lewis, Roberts, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mason v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 3, 2023
360 So. 3d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Mason v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Mason, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: May 3, 2023

Citations

360 So. 3d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)