From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 20, 2019
No. 75285-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 75285-COA

03-20-2019

MACK C. MASON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Mack C. Mason appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction for a writ of habeas corpus filed on November 15, 2016. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g).

Mason's petition was untimely because it was filed more than 14 years after the remittitur on direct appeal was issued on September 3, 2002, and it was successive because he had previously filed several postconviction petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(2). Therefore, his petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, Mason was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice to the State. See NRS 34.800(2).

See Mason v. State, 118 Nev. 554, 51 P.3d 521 (2002).

See Mason v. State, Docket No. 71296 (Order of Affirmance, May 16, 2017); Mason v. State, Docket No. 58517 (Order of Affirmance, November 17, 2011). Mason voluntarily dismissed the petition he filed in the district court on September 5, 2002, and he did not appeal from the district court order denying the petition he filed on January 23, 2003. --------

To the extent Mason claimed that he had good cause because the district court failed to appoint postconviction counsel and thereby violated Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), his good cause claim was without merit. The appointment of counsel in Mason's postconviction proceedings was not statutorily or constitutionally required. See Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303, 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159, 164, 912 P.2d 255, 258 (1996). Moreover, the Nevada Supreme Court has determined that Martinez does not apply to Nevada's statutory postconviction procedures. See Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. 565, 571-72, 331 P.3d 867, 871 (2014).

Mason failed to demonstrate good cause or a fundamental miscarriage of justice sufficient to excuse the procedural bars to his petition and the State's specific plea of laches. Therefore, the district court did not err by denying the petition, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge

Mack C. Mason

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Mason v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 20, 2019
No. 75285-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Mason v. State

Case Details

Full title:MACK C. MASON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

No. 75285-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 20, 2019)