From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. Mason

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 6, 2019
192 Wash. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2019)

Opinion

No. 96438-6

03-06-2019

In the Matter of the Marriage of: John MASON, Respondent, v. Tatyana MASON, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply to the answer to the petition for review, motion for a continuance, and motion to accept the reply to the answer to the petition for review are all denied. The Respondent's motion to strike the reply to the answer to the petition for review and the Respondent's request for attorney fees are both denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Mason v. Mason

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 6, 2019
192 Wash. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2019)
Case details for

Mason v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of: John MASON, Respondent, v. Tatyana…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Mar 6, 2019

Citations

192 Wash. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2019)
435 P.3d 272

Citing Cases

Mason v. Mason

¶24 The supreme court denied Tatyana's petition for review on March 6, 2019. In re Marriage of Mason , 192…