From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00578-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00578-REB-KLM

01-04-2012

SCOTT MASON, Plaintiff, v. STEVE HARTLEY, Warden Fremont Corr. Fac., MR. HUGHES, Commander FCF S.E.R.T., C/O FRANCIS, FCF S.E.R.T., and J. DOE, FCF Health Ser v. Admin., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification [Docket No. 61; Filed January 3, 2012] (the "Motion"). Plaintiff requests a clarification with respect to the Minute Entry [#61] for the Scheduling Conference held on August 18, 2011. The language at issue states: "Each side shall be limited to 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for production of documents, and 15 requests for admissions." See Minute Entry [#61] at 2.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court clarifies as follows: Plaintiff may only submit a total of 15 interrogatories to Defendants, not 15 interrogatories to each Defendant. Similarly, Defendants collectively may only submit a total of 15 interrogatories to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff believes that more than 15 interrogatories are necessary, he must file a motion with the Court making the request and stating with specificity why more than 15 interrogatories are required for the development of his case.


Summaries of

Mason v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00578-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Mason v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT MASON, Plaintiff, v. STEVE HARTLEY, Warden Fremont Corr. Fac., MR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00578-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 2012)