From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. Ford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Aug 27, 1918
174 P. 770 (Okla. 1918)

Opinion

No. 9749

Opinion Filed August 27, 1918.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal — Moot Question.

Appeal dismissed for the reason that the question presented for review has become moot and hypothetical.

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Chas. G. Watts, Judge.

In the matter of Stella Mason nee Manuel. P.M. Ford was appointed guardian on the application of Isaac Mason, and Stella Mason brings error. Appeal dismissed.

S.M. Rutherford and James W. Cosgrove, for plaintiff in error.

Zevely, Givens Stoutz, S.V. O'Hare, and Brown Stewart, for defendants in error.


This cause comes on to be heard upon the suggestion of the death of the appellant and motion to dismiss appeal filed by her attorneys of record. The motion is accompanied by a showing to the effect that the appeal was taken from an order of the trial court appointing a guardian of the person and estate of the appellant; that after the said appeal was prosecuted to this court the appellant died, and thereafter her former guardian was appointed as her executor; that up to the time of the death of the appellant her estate was in the hands of P.M. Ford as guardian, and that it is now in the hands of P.M. Ford as executor.

In these circumstances the question presented for review has become moot and hypothetical, and the motion to dismiss must therefore be sustained.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Mason v. Ford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Aug 27, 1918
174 P. 770 (Okla. 1918)
Case details for

Mason v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:MASON v. FORD et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 27, 1918

Citations

174 P. 770 (Okla. 1918)
71 Okla. 8