From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 20, 2006
No. 04-1795-PCT-ECV (D. Ariz. Jun. 20, 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-1795-PCT-ECV.

June 20, 2006


ORDER


Defendant has filed a Renewed Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #45) in which it again seeks sanctions against non-party Jim Burton Realty for filing an unsupported motion to quash a subpoena. The non-party has filed a Response to Renewed Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #47). In a prior order (Doc. #37), the court denied without prejudice the original motion for sanctions. The only new information in Defendant's renewed motion is that the non-party waited 17 days after the court's order denying the motion to quash before it produced the documents. The court finds that these circumstances do not warrant sanctions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Defendant's Renewed Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #45) is denied.


Summaries of

Mason v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 20, 2006
No. 04-1795-PCT-ECV (D. Ariz. Jun. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Mason v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Robert and Linda Mason, Plaintiffs, v. American Family Mutual Insurance…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 20, 2006

Citations

No. 04-1795-PCT-ECV (D. Ariz. Jun. 20, 2006)