From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason Sign v. City of Breckenridge Hills

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Mar 9, 2004
135 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 83103

March 9, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Kenneth M. Romines, Judge.

Howard Paperner, R. Henry Branom Jr., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Paul E. Martin, Clayton, MO, for respondent.

Before Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


Petitioner, Mason Sign Company, Inc., appeals from a judgment affirming the decision of the City Council of the City of Breckenridge Hills denying petitioner's applications for a merchant's license.

The City of Breckenridge Hills has filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement based on letters exchanged by counsel for the parties while this case has been on appeal. We have reviewed the letters and conclude that promises and performances set out therein are too uncertain and conditional to bind the parties to a settlement. See Donley v. Parker, 833 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Mo.App. 1992). The motion to enforce settlement is denied.

The decision of the City Council is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mason Sign v. City of Breckenridge Hills

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Mar 9, 2004
135 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Mason Sign v. City of Breckenridge Hills

Case Details

Full title:MASON SIGN COMPANY, INC., Petitioner/Appellant, v. CITY OF BRECKENRIDGE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Mar 9, 2004

Citations

135 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)