From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. City of Paterson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 9, 1973
303 A.2d 84 (N.J. 1973)

Opinion

Argued April 2 and 3, 1973 —

Decided April 9, 1973.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division.

Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for defendants-appellants City of Paterson, et al. Mr. Dennis J. Cummins, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents Mason, et al. Mr. Leonard S. Miller argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants ( Messrs. Miller and Reenstra, attorneys).

Mr. Charles H. Roemer argued the cause for respondents Board of Commissioners of Assessment of Taxes, etc.


The trial court held, among other things, that the statute establishing the form of government for the City of Paterson was unconstitutional. 120 N.J. Super. 184 (Law Div. 1972). On motion, we certified the appeals prior to consideration in the Appellate Division.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. There is reserved to the trial court authority to amend the timetable in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of the judgment if circumstances shall so warrant.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, MOUNTAIN and SULLIVAN and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Mason v. City of Paterson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 9, 1973
303 A.2d 84 (N.J. 1973)
Case details for

Mason v. City of Paterson

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MASON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF PATERSON, ET…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 9, 1973

Citations

303 A.2d 84 (N.J. 1973)
303 A.2d 84

Citing Cases

Toms River Affiliates v. Department of Environmental Protection

We conclude that the act is a general one and does not violate the provisions of the New Jersey Constitution.…

Sojourner A. v. N.J.D.H.S

See Planned Parenthood, supra, 165 N.J. at 629; Right to Choose, supra, 91 N.J. at 303. Thirty years ago,…