From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maskelunas v. Skerl

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2007
Case No. 3:06-cv-242-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-242-KRG-KAP.

January 3, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on December 7, 2005, docket no. 6, recommending that plaintiff's federal claims be dismissed with prejudice and that the plaintiff's motion to remand, docket no. 2, be granted.

The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections, and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of objection thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2007, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand, docket no. 2, is granted as follows: any federal claims by plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice, and the complaint is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Maskelunas v. Skerl

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2007
Case No. 3:06-cv-242-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Maskelunas v. Skerl

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM S. MASKELUNAS, Plaintiff, v. ANTON SKERL, M.D., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-242-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2007)