From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MASKE v. IBM CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 11, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00581-BNB (D. Colo. May. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00581-BNB.

May 11, 2009


ORDER TO FILE CLAIMS ON A TITLE VII COMPLAINT FORM


Plaintiff, Jerry L. Maske, submitted a pro se Complaint on March 10, 2009. On April 13, 2009, the Court instructed Mr. Maske to amend the Complaint in keeping with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. Mr. Maske filed an Amended Complaint on April 28, 2009, in which he raises claims against Defendant under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Court must construe Mr. Maske's Complaint liberally, because he is a pro se litigant. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991).

The ADA expressly adopts Title Vll's administrative exhaustion requirements. 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a). Therefore, an ADA plaintiff must exhaust his claims before an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) as a prerequisite to a federal court having jurisdiction over the ADA claims. Mr. Maske has failed to allege or to demonstrate that he has met the statutory prerequisites for maintaining an employment discrimination lawsuit in federal court. He fails to allege that he has received a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC and, if he did, what date he received the letter.

The Court, therefore, will direct Mr. Maske to file a Second Amended Complaint on a Title VII Court-approved form. Mr. Maske is instructed to complete the form in full. He also is instructed to indicate whether he has met statutory prerequisites for maintaining an employment discrimination lawsuit in federal court. He is further directed to attach to the Complaint a copy of the right-to-sue letter he received from the EEOC if he received such a letter. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Mr. Maske file, within thirty days from the date of this Order, a completed Court-approved form used in filing Title VII complaints. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail to Plaintiff two copies of a Court-approved form used in filing Title VII complaints. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to file a completed Title VII Complaint form within thirty days of the date of this Order the Complaint and action will be dismissed without further notice.


Summaries of

MASKE v. IBM CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 11, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00581-BNB (D. Colo. May. 11, 2009)
Case details for

MASKE v. IBM CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:JERRY L. MASKE, Plaintiff, v. IBM CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: May 11, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00581-BNB (D. Colo. May. 11, 2009)