From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mashburn v. Yamhill Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 9, 2011
Civil No. 08-718-HU (D. Or. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-718-HU

11-09-2011

JEFORY MASHBURN, et al, Plaintiff, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, ET AL, Defendants.


ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. All claims for punitive damages against defendants Yamhill County and Tim Loewen are subject to dismissal;

2. Defendant Loewen is not a defendant as to proposed Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4;

3. All claims against defendant Paasch which arose prior to February of 2010 when he became the Division Manager are subject to dismissal, and

4. There is no "Class 6" and any inadvertent reference to "Class 6" should be stricken.

Michael W. Mosman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mashburn v. Yamhill Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 9, 2011
Civil No. 08-718-HU (D. Or. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Mashburn v. Yamhill Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JEFORY MASHBURN, et al, Plaintiff, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, ET AL, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 08-718-HU (D. Or. Nov. 9, 2011)