From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mascarenas v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2013
Case No. EDCV 13-1109-BRO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

Summary

finding that "the jury could reasonably infer prior planning because petitioner was armed with a knife when the incident occurred" and collecting cases

Summary of this case from Villalobos v. Biter

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-1109-BRO (JEM)

12-03-2013

TRAVIS MASCARENAS, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

______________________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mascarenas v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2013
Case No. EDCV 13-1109-BRO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

finding that "the jury could reasonably infer prior planning because petitioner was armed with a knife when the incident occurred" and collecting cases

Summary of this case from Villalobos v. Biter
Case details for

Mascarenas v. Long

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS MASCARENAS, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2013

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-1109-BRO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Villalobos v. Biter

Based on the evidence that Petitioner went in the house and returned to the fight with the pit bulls, armed…