From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marx v. American Home Assurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.).


The IAS Court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff was contractually obligated to inform American when he obtained information which might possibly lead to liability. He received such information and forwarded it to American in 1980. A case file was opened at that time. The provisions of the governing 1980-1981 policy are clear and unambiguous, and according to its terms, the claim was interposed when plaintiff gave notice, not when an action subsequently was commenced. Plaintiff's bare allegations of fraud and bad faith, which are devoid of any factual support, are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment. Indeed, plaintiff, a sophisticated attorney-accountant, consented to the settlement of the underlying action, in which defendant insurer exhausted the applicable policy limits.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Marx v. American Home Assurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Marx v. American Home Assurance Company

Case Details

Full title:DAVID C. MARX, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 160