From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marvin v. Goldhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

April, 1929.


Order and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In an action upon an account stated the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice when the answer generally denies the allegations of the complaint and the defendant's affidavit in opposition to the motion to strike out the answer and for judgment shows that an issue of fact as to whether there was an account stated is presented. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marvin v. Goldhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Marvin v. Goldhurst

Case Details

Full title:PERCY R. MARVIN, Respondent, v. CLARA GOLDHURST, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Sundure Paint Corp. v. Nursery Crafters

( Parsons v. Batchelor, 233 A.D. 517.) In the instant case, notwithstanding the lapse of time and other facts…

Gravel Prods. v. Sunnydale Acres

Under a general denial the defendant is permitted to explain his silence and delay and to go into the facts…