denying rescission where plaintiffs sat back and tested "the waters" to see if defendants achieve an increase in value before seeking rescission
Summary of this case from Gotham Partners v. Hallwood RealtyNo. 10, 1997.
March 26, 1997.
Appeal from the Superior court, Sussex County, CrA. 589-01-1318.
Affirmed.
denying rescission where plaintiffs sat back and tested "the waters" to see if defendants achieve an increase in value before seeking rescission
Summary of this case from Gotham Partners v. Hallwood Realtystating that compound interest is also the exception and not the rule with respect to prejudgment interest
Summary of this case from Beau v. M.G. Bancorporation, Inc.Full title:Marvel v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Mar 26, 1997
That is not the case here, however, as the Hempstead Valuation did not calculate a beta for the Eight Centers…
Williams v. FarmsUnemployment Ins. Appeal Bd. v. Martin, 431 A.2d 1265 (Del. 1981); Pochvatilla v. United States Postal Serv.,…