From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marva v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 14, 2006
2:06-cv-00961 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2006)

Opinion

2:06-cv-00961.

August 14, 2006


ORDER OF COURT


AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2006, upon consideration of Defendants' NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Document No. 1), PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' PETITION FOR REMOVAL ALLEDGING "FRAUDULENT JOINDER" AND MOTION FOR REMAND (Document No. 9) and Defendants' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND (Document No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs' motion to remand this personal injury case to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County is GRANTED. The claims arise under state law and there is not complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Defendants contend that Laurey Dirito, a pharmacist, was fraudulently joined for the purpose of defeating diversity jurisdiction.

Defendants have failed to meet their heavy burden to demonstrate fraudulent joinder. The parties dispute the contours of a pharmacist's duty to warn of possible side effects of over-the-counter medications, but both sides acknowledge that there is no case directly on-point. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims against this non-diverse Defendant are, at a minimum, colorable. These allegations are sufficient to deprive this Court of diversity jurisdiction.

The Clerk shall remand this action to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County, Pennsylvania, FORTHWITH.


Summaries of

Marva v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 14, 2006
2:06-cv-00961 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Marva v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MARVA and CHRIS MARVA, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. MATRIXX INITIATIVES…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 14, 2006

Citations

2:06-cv-00961 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2006)