From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marullo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 8, 1964
330 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20756.

April 8, 1964.

Sam Monk Zelden, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

William J. Hamilton, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.

Before CAMERON, WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.


It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause is hereby denied.

One point deserves clarification. Petitioner argues that the search in question must be found to be "unreasonable" under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that the present case is controlled by Chapman v. United States, 1961, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S.Ct. 776, 5 L.Ed.2d 828. Since we held that the location of the evidence in question was not within the protection of the Fourth Amendment, the reasonableness of the search is not a relevant constitutional consideration.


Summaries of

Marullo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 8, 1964
330 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Marullo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Paul MARULLO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 8, 1964

Citations

330 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wainwright

On clarification, the Court added that inasmuch as the location of the evidence in question was not within…

United States ex rel. Fletcher v. Wainwright

On clarification, the Court added that inasmuch as the location of the evidence in question was not within…