From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martz v. PNC Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1075 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2007)

Summary

holding that the named plaintiff would not be an adequate class representative because of his long standing close friendship with class counsel and the uncertainty of whether the plaintiff was actually a member of the proposed class

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. Guglielmo

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1075.

August 15, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2007, after the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification in the above-captioned case, and after the defendant filed a memorandum opposing class certification, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff, as well as the defendant's response to those objections, and upon independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for class certification (Document No. 36) is denied.


Summaries of

Martz v. PNC Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1075 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2007)

holding that the named plaintiff would not be an adequate class representative because of his long standing close friendship with class counsel and the uncertainty of whether the plaintiff was actually a member of the proposed class

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. Guglielmo

denying class certification

Summary of this case from Center City Periodontists, P.C. v. Dentsply International, Inc.
Case details for

Martz v. PNC Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL A. MARTZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1075 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Ristorante La Buca Inc.

In our present range of twenty to twenty-two employees, our Court of Appeals recently directed we must engage…

Victory v. Berks Cnty.

Modafinil, 837 F.3d at 249 (quoting Robidoux v. Celani, 987 F.2d 931, 935 (2d Cir. 1993)). Martz v PNC Bank,…